In partnership with
For twenty years, the default way to get connectivity from space was to rent it.
On Thursday, two Finnish companies offered governments a different deal: buy the whole thing, and nobody else holds the switch.
Table of Contents
What happened
Nokia and ICEYE announced a partnership to build secure broadband satellite systems in low Earth orbit. The customers are governments: armed forces, border guards, emergency services, disaster response.
The detail that matters is ownership. Each customer nation will own and control the satellites, the ground stations and the rugged terminals soldiers and rescue crews carry. Not a subscription. Not a service contract. The hardware and the control both sit with the buyer.
ICEYE builds the satellites. Nokia brings secure networking and its growing defense business. The two CEOs say they expect to launch up to 50 satellites a year starting in 2028.
Why now
ICEYE has done this before, on a smaller scale. It delivered Poland a four-satellite radar constellation, owned by the Polish Armed Forces, in under twelve months.
That timeline is the pitch. Large sovereign space programs move slowly. Europe's own government constellation has been years in the making. A defense ministry that wants control of its own links before the end of the decade now has a supplier offering to deliver on a schedule measured in months.
And Europe has spent three years watching how much of Ukraine's battlefield connectivity runs through a single American company's decisions. Every defense planner on the continent has drawn the same conclusion privately. Nobody had to write it in the press release.
The agentic era needs a different CRM. That’s Attio.
Parallel, Turbopuffer, and Wordsmith run their entire GTM motion on Attio, with agents that chase every buying signal, build pipeline, and move deals forward, 24/7.
What it signals
Starlink sells access. Nokia and ICEYE are selling possession.
Those are two different products, even when the satellites look alike. Access is cheaper, faster to start and better at scale. Possession is slower and more expensive. It's also the only option that still works when the provider changes its mind, its owner or its government.
For most of the internet era, European buyers picked access because the price was right and the risk felt theoretical. The risk no longer feels theoretical. The buyers are changing the question they ask. It used to be "how good is the service?" Now it's "what happens if the provider says no?"
The announcement landed the day before the Helsinki Security Forum, where both CEOs are presenting on a panel about European technological sovereignty.
Stop rewriting prompts. Start engineering loops.
Most developers babysit AI one prompt at a time. Top engineers don't, they build loops that plan, execute, and self-correct. The Code built The Ultimate Guide to Loop Engineering, giving you the exact system Silicon Valley engineers use. Sign up and get the guide free, plus a 5-minute daily newsletter.
What it means for builders
The same shift is happening far below orbit.
If you build software or AI services for European public sector or defense-adjacent clients, the satellite deal is a preview of the procurement conversation coming your way. Buyers will ask whether they can own what they pay for. Can they run it on their own servers? Do they get the code, the model weights or the data in a usable form if the contract ends? Can they keep operating if your company disappears or gets bought?
Most SaaS products answer no to all of these. That was fine when the buyer only wanted access.
The opportunity is in products designed to be handed over. Software a client can deploy on its own infrastructure. Models it can run locally. Contracts with real exit rights and documentation good enough that the client's own staff can take over. These products are harder to build and harder to lock customers into. Those are the reasons sovereign buyers will pay more for them.
Nokia sold phones to the world. Now it wants to sell governments the keys.
404 Found covers AI and Tech developments from a European Insider, three times a week.
AI research, explained in one morning email
Most of what shapes AI next year is sitting in a research paper today. Keeping up with them is a full-time job, and the abstracts don't help.
TLDR AI is the newsletter that does the translating. Each morning you get the handful of papers worth knowing about, curated by Anthropic and ex-Google engineers, with a plain-English summary of what they found and why it matters.
You come away smarter about AI research in the time it takes to finish your coffee.
Free, and delivered to 1.1M+ inboxes every morning.